<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Email marketing 777 &#187; Other - Politics &amp; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/category/other-politics-government/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emailmarketing777.com</link>
	<description>Email marketing WebBLog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why are GOP officials so disdainful of their own voters and supporters here on Yahoo and elsewhere?</title>
		<link>http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/928</link>
		<comments>http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/928#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 10:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Other - Politics & Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cruella Deville]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gop Officials]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Republican Sources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exclusive: RNC document mocks donors, plays on &#8216;fear&#8217;
By: Ben Smith
March 3, 2010 04:23 PM EST 
The Republican National Committee plans to raise money this election cycle through an aggressive campaign capitalizing on “fear” of President Barack Obama and a promise to &#8220;save the country from trending toward socialism.&#8221; 
The strategy was detailed in a confidential [...]<p><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com">Email marketing 777</a><br/><br/><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/928">Why are GOP officials so disdainful of their own voters and supporters here on Yahoo and elsewhere?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><br/>Exclusive: RNC document mocks donors, plays on &#8216;fear&#8217;<br />
By: Ben Smith<br />
March 3, 2010 04:23 PM EST </p>
<p>The Republican National Committee plans to raise money this election cycle through an aggressive campaign capitalizing on “fear” of President Barack Obama and a promise to &#8220;save the country from trending toward socialism.&#8221; </p>
<p>The strategy was detailed in a confidential party fundraising presentation, obtained by POLITICO, which also outlines how “ego-driven” wealthy donors can be tapped with offers of access and “tchochkes.” </p>
<p>The presentation was delivered by RNC Finance Director Rob Bickhart to top donors and fundraisers at a party retreat in Boca Grande, Florida on February 18, a source at the gathering said. </p>
<p>In neat PowerPoint pages, it lifts the curtain on the often-cynical terms of political marketing, displaying an air of disdain for the party’s donors that is usually confined to the barroom conversations of political operatives. </p>
<p>The presentation explains the Republican fundraising in simple terms. </p>
<p>&#8220;What can you sell when you do not have the White House, the House, or the Senate&#8230;?&#8221; it asks. </p>
<p>The answer: &#8220;Save the country from trending toward Socialism!” </p>
<p>Manipulating donors with crude caricatures and playing on their fears is hardly unique to Republicans or to the RNC – Democrats raised millions off George W. Bush in similar terms – but rarely is it practiced in such cartoonish terms. </p>
<p>One page, headed “The Evil Empire,” pictures Obama as the Joker from Batman, while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leaders Harry Reid are depicted as Cruella DeVille and Scooby Doo, respectively. </p>
<p>The document, which two Republican sources said was prepared by the party’s finance staff, comes as Chairman Michael Steele struggles to retain the trust and allegiance of major donors, who can give as much as $30,400 a year to the party. </p>
<p>Under Steele, the RNC has shifted toward a reliance on small donors, but the document reveals extensive, confidential details of the strategy for luring wealthy checkwriters, which range from luxury retreats in California wine country to tickets to a professional fight in Las Vegas. </p>
<p>The 72-page document was provided to POLITICO by a Democrat, who said a hard copy had been left in the hotel hosting the $2,500-a-head retreat, the Gasparilla Inn &#038; Club. Sources at the event said the presentation was delivered by Bickhart and by the RNC Finance Chairman, Peter Terpeluk, a former ambassador to Luxembourg under President George W. Bush. </p>
<p>The RNC reacted with alarm to a question about it Wednesday, emailing major donors to warn them of a reporter’s question, and distancing Steele from its contents.</p>
<p>“The document was used for a fundraising presentation Chairman Steele did not attend, nor had he seen the document,” RNC Communications Director Doug Heye said in an email. “Fundraising documents are often controversial. </p>
<p>“Obviously, the Chairman disagrees with the language and finds the use of such imagery to be unacceptable. It will not be used by the Republican National Committee – in any capacity – in the future,” Heye said. </p>
<p>The most unusual section of the presentation is a set of six slides headed “RNC Marketing 101.” The presentation divides fundraising into two traditional categories, direct marketing and major donors, and lays out the details of how to approach each group. </p>
<p>The small donors who are the targets of direct marketing are described under the heading “Visceral Giving.” Their motivations are listed as “fear;” “Extreme negative feelings toward existing Administration;” and “Reactionary.” </p>
<p>Major donors, by contrast, are treated in a column headed “Calculated Giving.”<br />
Their motivations include: “Peer to Peer Pressure”; “access”; and “Ego-Driven.” </p>
<p>The slide also allows that donors may have more honorable motives, including “Patriotic Duty.” </p>
<p>A major Republican donor described the state of the RNC’s relationship with major donors as “disastrous,” with veteran givers beginning to abandon the committee, which is becoming increasingly reliant on small donors. </p>
<p>The party’s average contribution in 2009, according to the document, was just $40, and the shift toward a financial reliance on the grassroots may help explain Steele’s increasingly strident tone toward the Obama Administration. </p>
<p>While the crude portrayal of Obama may be - as Steele ‘s spokesman put it - “unacceptable,” other elements of the presentation may be of equal interest to close political observers. </p>
<p>The RNC plans to raise $8.6 million from major donors alone in 2010, less than 10% of its total 2009 fundraising take, which was primarily from small donors.&#8221;</p>
<p>The center of that plan is an extensive, and colorful, schedule of events. Along with traditional fundraisers with conservative luminaries including Weekly Standard Editor Bill Kristol and former presidential candidate Steve Forbes, the party plans to raise $80,000 for a trip to Lond<br/><a href=''></a></div>
<p><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com">Email marketing 777</a><br/><br/><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/928">Why are GOP officials so disdainful of their own voters and supporters here on Yahoo and elsewhere?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/928/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we have the solution to internet email SPAM?</title>
		<link>http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/763</link>
		<comments>http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/763#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Other - Politics & Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Spam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet Email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Do Not Email Registry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet email Spam is where some website takes your email address (maybe you filled out a form or subscription with them), then passes your email address around to the world.  You end up clearing out dozens of unwanted emails every time you open Outlook.  And the more you &#8220;unsubscribe&#8221; to emails, the more [...]<p><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com">Email marketing 777</a><br/><br/><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/763">Do we have the solution to internet email SPAM?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><br/>Internet email Spam is where some website takes your email address (maybe you filled out a form or subscription with them), then passes your email address around to the world.  You end up clearing out dozens of unwanted emails every time you open Outlook.  And the more you &#8220;unsubscribe&#8221; to emails, the more the marketers just pass your email address onto someone else.  You can never fully unsubscribe.</p>
<p>And Spam blocking software is not 100% effective, and sometimes takes up lots of memory and dogs out Outlook.</p>
<p>A solution to this madness?  Since we have a national &#8220;Do Not Call&#8221; registry, I wonder if we should have a national &#8220;Do not email&#8221; registry.  This would prevent many of the unwanted SPAM emails &#8220;before&#8221; they were sent, rather than forcing the recipient to exercise the &#8220;plug the leaking dam&#8221; routine with emails &#8220;after&#8221; they have been received.</p>
<p>Thoughts?  Do you support this?  </p>
<p>If you do, then write your congressperson at congress.org.</p>
<p>I wrote mine.<br/><a href=''></a></div>
<p><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com">Email marketing 777</a><br/><br/><a href="http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/763">Do we have the solution to internet email SPAM?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://emailmarketing777.com/archives/763/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
